Your being naughty again...........pss........have you found Thomas yet
"
numerology." = Show me a post where I've produced or promoted numerology hmmmmm
"
his own theology"
Nope, not mine but as per the Truth, from Inters etc.
Ex - The expected, logical and commonsense, as what to expect of John's opener = Isa 40:3, Mal 3:1 = Introducing the God and Father and His word for the 1st 13 verses = a perfect Chronological flow instead of mayhem like all you CC planted seeds follow.
You know the two vital quotes for John, of which you deluded ones toss in the bin.
In beginning was the word and the word was (ongoing, in progress =) toward (unto) the Theon and Theos (father) was the word.
This; was in beginning (ongoing, in progress =) toward (unto) the Theon.
All (us) through (it) Him came into being and without (it) came into being not even one (us) that has come into being.
In (it) Him life was (words) and that life was the light of (the) man.
1:9 Was the light (word - father) true that enlightens (makes alive) every man coming into the world - (ex - Adam)
When you find out why John used two different spellings for the English word God = the penny should drop and make you realize why you cannot in anyway tamper with the above word order of John 1:1c, otherwise you grossly tamper with John's clear and intended message and the exact same two things he was linking with the word "and".
Then the penny may also drop for verse 1:2 = the Only 1st word there should be "This;" or at tops "The same", as there clearly is NOT a second person or being being referenced.
And what was ongoing = plan and purpose = 1:3.
Isa 44:24 - Thus says Yehowah, your Redeemer, And He who formed you from the womb: “I Yehowah, who makes all;Who stretches out the heavens all alone; Who spreads abroad the earth by Myself;Despite the creations of the likes of TD and Angus, NO verse support the Son being name Yehowah as well as the Father.
Absolutely NO hands on for the Son during creation.
Have YOOU read like the Son had to, to find out the following, which also confirms this Isa quote ----- Why Not??? 
Matt 19:4 - And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who madethem at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’
Tell us mate, did he not have all his memory back yet, that he's supposed to have emptied before coming, and not mention he was there with the Father making man - as he certainly doesn't even hint at him being there???John 1:1b
pros:advantageous for, at (denotes local proximity), toward (denotes motion toward aplace)
OriginalWord: πρός
Part ofSpeech: Preposition
Transliteration: pros
PhoneticSpelling: (pros)
Definition: advantageousfor, at (denotes local proximity), toward (denotes motion toward a place) = John 1:3 - and leading to eternal life through the word of God.
And what Greek word does John use when he wants the word "with", as per his same usage of "toward" and "with" 3 times in 1 John 1:1-3, to align with John's 1:1,2's truth.
meta: with, after, among
Original Word:μετά
Part of Speech:Preposition
Transliteration:meta
Pronunciation:meh-tah'
Phonetic Spelling:(met-ah')
Hmm, fancy that eh , but hey, lets not let truth get in the way of the Checkmate Lie of satan's that most have adopted with passion eh.
That would mean taking the narrow Gate and narrow Road 
Matt 7:13,14.
