Interesting theory scoot, however it does leave a big question hanging: if that’s correct, why did they even bother producing a Scoping Study based on just 4% of the resource drilled? How could they possibly justify skipping the PFS stage and going straight to a DFS? etc
BLM BIG SANDY APPROVED!, page-140
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 202 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AZL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $76.05M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.7¢ | 1.7¢ | 1.6¢ | $215.9K | 13.15M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 3292502 | 1.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7¢ | 588275 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 31/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AZL (ASX) Chart |