The case isn't being decided on wildlife habitat. The issue is...

The case isn't being decided on wildlife habitat. The issue is the historical, cultural and religious significance of an actual "place." Native American tribes haven't won when they have said, "All this land is meaningful to us," but they have won when they have been able to point to an actual, tangible location. That's why Hakamwe is significant. It's true that a two-page letter concerning three species was included in several hundred pages of attachments to the petition for a TRO, but that's not going to be argued on September 17. If it makes you feel better to talk about it, you certainly are entitled to relieve your grief.