I’ve said this before but it’s only going to wind up putting the protection of women second place to creepy people’s feelings. We’ve seen the rise of assaults in the girl’s toilets & women’s prisons by men with fake or medically induced boobs.
I’ve mentioned a scenario before as well, something like this:
( in this story I crazily denote male as having been born with a pee pee & female as having been born with a wee wee. Seek help if you can’t understand what I mean by those two things ).
A family is driving to the AFL. Little Johnny hit his sister in the back seat because she pinched him or any other of million things kids squabble over.
Mum & Dad turn around to tell little Johnny that it’s wrong to hit girls- that there is never an excuse.
Then the family get to the AFL, where little Johnny and little Joanie watch a grown man tackle, shoulder barge & some time probably strike a female player. The boy is taught that it actually is ok to harm women- more than ok as the man beating up the women is paid and applauded by the crowd. The boy is taught that there will be situations where it is ok for her to be harmed- again, more than that- she learns that a woman getting harmed by a man is a kind of spectacle.
They will both go on to make use of those life lessons. Little Johnny to perhaps harm women himself & little Joanie to believe that she should accept being harmed.
People will try to say things like ‘oh but we’ll be able to teach them bla bla bla- people don’t do things just because they’ve seen others do them’.
Yeah right- now let’s examine how things like assaults against women & kids are perpetuated.
Most child abusers were harmed or saw harm as children. Exposure to anything increases the likelihood that it will be repeated.
We know that full well. The problem now is the idea that we’re supposed to pretend that we don’t know certain things- to basically suspend logic, disconnect ourselves from reality through the use of buzzwords, the use of word salads that mean nothing at all & of course the best one of all, to just outright lie.
Let’s all see how pretending that the most fundamental diversity on the planet is that between man and woman, ( a wonderous & great thing ), violence doesn’t beget violence, that children exposed to violence/sexual depravity don’t grow up to emulate those things & of course the best of all from the far left? The idea that a culture with a book ordering harm, bigotry and even murder especially against women and gay people is somehow a really progressive and feminist ideology.
Call me nuts but I don’t think this is going to end well & Western women, children & gay people will be the biggest losers. It’s almost like the far left are liars, isn’t it? The 3 groups they pretend to care about are nothing more than sacrificial lambs to be slaughtered at the altar of self indulgence by infantile adults.
Ignoring their words, we see the far left is actually callous in its regard for diversity, decency & decorum at best- violently opposed at worst. ( while being happy to deploy an imported ideology as a cover while those things increase in frequency ).
I’m a boy. I have a pee pee. My sister is a girl. She has a wee wee. My mate is gay, he likes pee pees. Our other friend is gay, she like wee wees. A kid can’t defend themselves & so we adults do that for them. All of us deserve our space and right to a life without violence etc or the fear of it.
As always for any of our less than stable friends- note that I say far left. Most of us are left of centre on most issues, firmly right of centre on a few core issues. If anyone would like to argue that please to see how women, children, gays & differing religious groups are treated around the world.
If you come back & still want to pretend the West is horrible? To me you’re just a liar and a fraud so don’t even bother. Just call me a right wing extremist/nazi or whatever else you call people who believe that we should all be treated equally. There’s no such thing as ‘more’ equality once we reach ‘all who will behave thenselves are welcome’, no matter how much you try to say there is.
Expand
