Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

" when there were clear indications that Vic still had an active...

First 151 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hingdog

22,475 Posts.

1375

03/01/22

01:55

Post #: 58610003
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag ↑

yes, just about 4-5 weeks..... and then the slow increases in infection rates.

and lets not forget either that Andrews had protested several times at Morrison virtually ordering Andrews to open up Vic when there were clear indications that Vic still had an active reservoir of infection..... I clearly recall the pressure that was applied on Andrews to open up.

too soon mate.

where I've always agreed that Andrews screwed up was in the management of the hotel quarantine.... it was a debacle at the start.... and how long did it take to fix the issues? another issue was the lockdown in the tower blocks. several other matters but rounded off with Andrews adopting the policy exercised in NSW of politicians having the final say on medical crises such as the state has suffered.

I bag Morrison but I also recognise some of his true successes, such as Jobseeker, I would add Jobkeeper but this was marred by inadequate administration and judgement, yet Jobseeker people get Robodebt and even Jobkeeper employees get demands.... crikey its hard to find anything that Morrison has done that is any good ---

Expand

" when there were clear indications that Vic still had an active reservoir of infection"

My god Scotty, you're still trying this on? The science is crystal clear where Vic second wave came from, it had nothing to do with "an active reservoir" and EVERYTHING to do with hotel quarantine ... you know the thing ANDREWS REFUSED HELP FROM MORISSON for!

btw your theory of there being remaining reservoirs of infection anywhere is plain wrong, every time we got to zero, the next wave was ALWAYS started by a traveller from overseas or interstate, again, the science Scotty
1 Upvote

Reply