bm as a function to lv aldp govt initiative, page-5

cheers Fakeshark.

I hope so too.

I consider many contingency / redundancy strategies.

When you consider the small bickies that have been outlayed at this point in time, and the recent political focus on LV.

All things are subject to change and subject to the contingencies built into any redundancies brought about by political change, which incorporates, but is not limited to community environmental empowerment.

By comparison, to me at least, it would appear that the few holes mnm funded to jorc up a BM resource, often mined, and dotted with many hundreds to thousands of recorded historical hole datum details from 1851 to the early 1970's , when it had fallen out of political strategic favour in favour of low toxic dumping then peri-urban development,, mainly to the immediate west of Werribee Geelong region, were imo, reclaim staking window dressing & community ''change'' testing, whilst the Govt focuses on plans for the 500 times larger,12 times more versatile, much cleaner by comparison, much shallower and softer overburden by comparison ( as little a 10 metres from the surface ) much deeper multi coal seam resource by comparison ( up to 250 metres of coal seam),,, over in Victoria's easten rural regions where by comparison, the community back lash would seem winnable.