Your guys are asking the wrong questions,
You all fail to understand this FACT. The MAJORITY of shareholders voted for this proposal. That said, Regent Pacific and Consolidated Minerals, own MORE than 50% of BCI. There is a 19.9% limit, on holders who own "Retail" shares. But Regent Pacific and/or Consolidated Minerals may also own "Institutional" shares in BCI. How else did those present at the vote get the proposal over 50%?
Mike Young and the rest of the BC Iron board must act in the interest of all shareholders. If the majority of shareholders (voting power) voted for the Regent proposal, Mike Young is obliged as Managing Director of BC Iron to SUPPORT the Regent Pacific proposal. You're blaming the wrong people here. Why not ask yourselves this question: Why did Glenn Balwin, ConsMin's BCI rep vote for the proposal?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BCI
- board cant have it both ways
BCI
bci minerals limited
Add to My Watchlist
1.45%
!
34.0¢

board cant have it both ways, page-6
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
34.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $981.7M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
34.5¢ | 34.5¢ | 34.0¢ | $83.04K | 241.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 141967 | 34.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
34.5¢ | 2339 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 141967 | 0.340 |
8 | 308130 | 0.335 |
14 | 407643 | 0.330 |
5 | 93219 | 0.325 |
7 | 183073 | 0.320 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.345 | 2339 | 2 |
0.350 | 274791 | 10 |
0.355 | 19770 | 2 |
0.360 | 84858 | 6 |
0.365 | 202348 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 07/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BCI (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
AGC
AUSTRALIAN GOLD AND COPPER LTD
Glen Diemar, MD
Glen Diemar
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online