Now that the Board has conceded the 249D Notice is valid, can we have the Board's assurance that the contemptible practice of issuing pre-filled proxy forms in favour of the sitting directors will not continue. Let's keep the process fair and open.
Now that the Board has conceded the 249D Notice is valid, can we...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NTM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(20.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.069M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | $5.388K | 1.097M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2677999 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 1050000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NTM (ASX) Chart |