bob stevens answers 2 questions, page-3

millways,

Just let me try and understand this response. Please correct me if I'm wrong:

1. The application has bypassed the Warden's Court for now because of RIO's objection. So if it's decided in favour of CAZ, it then goes back to the Warden for "rubber stamping" ie this is just to formalise the process. The Warden cannot then refuse the tenement to CAZ. Is this right? What does the response mean by "If the Minister decides not to terminate Cazaly's application at this time, it will simply continue its progress as normal through the Warden's Court and eventually come before the Minister for final determination."? Seems to go round in circles.

2. How does one go about obtaining RIO's submissions via the FOI Act?