Given most maps of Bogdan haven't been supplied with north...

Given most maps of Bogdan haven't been supplied with north marked on them, I didn't realise the significance of where our NE boundary was when the last announcement mentioned that mineralisation had been identified OUTSIDE our north-east boundary. I figure others may be in the same boat as myself.

"The Kupferschiefer has been previously reported as being intersected in historical drill holes to the north-east just outside the Balamara licence area. On this basis Balamara is confident that the favourable Kupferschiefer sequence underlies the majority of the 42sqkm Bogdan tenement area. Constant mineralisation over such a widespread area has significant consequences for the overall returns from an enlarged exploration drilling programme."

To get the north-east boundary into perspective, have a look at the map on page 13 of the Fox-Davies (FD) report.

http://www.uploadlibrary.com/foxdavies/Balamara_InitiationReport_150612.pdf

I checked with a map that was supplied in the original acquisition announcement which had lat/long lines on it, and confirmed that the FD map is north up, so the historic hole that encountered the mineralisation was outside our top right boundary. Our top right boundary is the furthest away from KGHM and also the furthest from the fault line.

The fault line runs north-west/south-east, with the mineralisation flowing north-east from the fault line into our tenement.

Further to the above, the FD report also tells us that;

"successful drilling programmes conducted by KGHM have extended to the boundary of Balamara’s EL"

Having now located the north-east boundary of our tenement, and given KGHM also found mineralisation on their boundary with us, I can see why the Company is so confident;

"that the favourable Kupferschiefer sequence underlies the majority of the 42sqkm Bogdan tenement area."

If someone could please post a copy of the Fox-Davies map from page 13 it would be appreciated, ... thanks.