From the annual report (pg 78), the following capital...

From the annual report (pg 78), the following capital expenditure has been incurred to 30 June 2013:

Mine properties & development 48.9
Ore processing facilities 26.5
Restoration 2.5
WIP 11.7

Total A$89.6m

I presume none of the above relates to Roseby as it has not commenced mining).

The DFS for Outokumpu showed estimated Capex of 32m Euros (approx A$50m) and NPV of $80m. I know that resourses have increased and mine life extended for a couple of years subsequently. Does additional capex or blow out in capex justify additional revenue at the tail end of the project.

The capex to 30/6/13 does not include "capital expenditure will continue at elevated levels at Outokumpu for up to 2 years" (pg 25).