So still I remain confused as to how we call our currently...

  1. 100 Posts.
    So still I remain confused as to how we call our currently labelled 'aborigals' our 'Australian Aboriginals' when clearly they are not and clearly they were simply the the most recent race to be overthrown and displaced on this continent.

    Should we begin DNA profiling to establish if we have any real Australian Aboriginal DNA among us, to which they would alone get the current benefits as they stand, with the currently named ?bogiginals' reduced to being treated like an everday Australian who needs to meet certain disadvantage markers before our Australia Tax Payer funded Governmnet will support them as an everyday Australian and hence create a more socially harmonising equality.

    Or should we exponentially tax migrants more and more as time goes on and disseminate the proceeds down the line to those who have been in Australia for the longest. Effectively each generation of migrant is 'invading' Australia and benefitting from our establishment of the nation in years gone by. This is why our current 'aboriginals' get Native Title Fee for being custodians of the land until European Settlement. This would mean that the current custodians get a custodian fee as well. Seems fair the principle of equality
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.