Sure, I see the angle, if that's where one wants to go.
It's good you give it some critical thinking consideration.
Maybe, he just didn't want to be part of another endless war that costs the tax payers billions of dollars and lives of their own citizens.
Well, if payments aren't derived from it, then that would seem an honourable proposition.
Why wouldn't Trump consult with his own department of defense and Afghan Government while going about this honourable proposition? While also freeing 5,000 enemy combatant prisoners while only leaving 2,500 (half as many) American troops to protect and evacuate?
Many countries have left others and theres no talk about who moved in afterwards.
Ok, so let's just let it slide as an honourable proposition.
Like Trump said the future is for patriots and not globalists. I believe he demonstrated it there.
That was obvious by his slandering of the American military for bringing in an extra 2,700 troops to protect and evacuate which he was going to do with only 2,500 American troops.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Yes, Biden should be damned for extending the time limit, bringing an extra 2,700 troops to do the work Trump was going to do with just 2,500 troops while the full force of the Taliban army were given at its disposal and extra 5,000 troops.
Being proactive and looking after you own is better than living in fear is it not?
Depends on who his own is with that list of payments to Trump against the foreign emoluments clause.
Why would Trump dismiss such consitutional importance? What critical thinking considerations would you have for that? How do you feel about his commemts of Putin and Hezbollah being geniuses or the like? What about the incidents surrounding January 6th?
