"While you are collecting data on 97% vs 3%, think about...

"While you are collecting data on 97% vs 3%, think about this.

Technically, there is nothing to stop anyone claiming to be a scientist."


Or rather, there's nothing to stop anyone representing themselves as experts on climate science. These readily spring to mind:

. Al Gore
. Tim Flannery
. Ross Garnaut

Thanks for the heads up.

I'm really surprised that a few climate change disciples are still on this forum banging on about a lost cause.

Any objective analysis of the politics of climate science [for that is what the IPCC has surely made it] has turned sharply against the true believers. In its latest report, the IPCC has back-tracked spectacularly and is content to try to salvage some semblance of credibility to keep its funding and the cosy careers for the central cabal.

Be assured that this government will rate "climate change action" as a low priority, so that the focus can turn back to important matters. The game is up.