Its not hard to beat your average Superfund (even industry fund) returns after fees. Let alone non industry funds that charge even more.
Just requires an SMSF and a reasonable sized capital base to start with (To make the SMSF costs worthwhile).
Some of the riskier asset classes (in industry & non industry s/f's) provide no more return than if you had an SMSF and put the $ in a term deposit or bought a rental and the capital / non capital yeild associated with that.
And yet you have to take on board much more risk to attain that return.
Just craziness.
Superfunds have provided poor returns because their very structures lends to excessive fees to cover the large structural costs associated with maintaining such funds as well as the managers themselves tendency towards Ridiculous management fees that do not reflect the level of work required to provide such management.
Anyway thats my rant done for the day.
So for the loose association with the property forum all...LOL
