Some may argue the royal Commission makes it look 50 times worse then it really is and does not reflect reality, there is normally a solid reason why things were done the way they were, in front of the commission though you just take it, if you give the reason they will keep asking why and it may be used against you down the track which is why the responses are normally vague.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Bottom here? Is it takeover positioning?
Some may argue the royal Commission makes it look 50 times worse...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AMP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$1.28 |
Change
-0.030(2.30%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.311B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.29 | $1.29 | $1.27 | $11.04M | 8.644M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 117488 | $1.27 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.28 | 20320 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 83384 | 1.270 |
7 | 216882 | 1.265 |
4 | 45000 | 1.260 |
4 | 50357 | 1.255 |
7 | 150085 | 1.250 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.280 | 17411 | 2 |
1.285 | 165012 | 7 |
1.290 | 174319 | 7 |
1.295 | 23205 | 1 |
1.300 | 33205 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AMP (ASX) Chart |