Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

And your point is?As net zero is (the impossible) aim the cost...

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
AmbrosePethick

20,062 Posts.

19/09/23

12:18

Post #: 69914922
Share

Originally posted by pauljbo470: ↑

This report is about the decarbonisation of the economy, not the replacement of domestic power generation sources.

Domestic power is a subset, this includes costs such as decarbonising the mining and transport industry (capital replacement of assetts). This is expensive but when you factor in the fact that capital assets (such as mining fleet) are replaced over time, it does not give a true picture of 'additional' cost.

The nuclear costs that have been quoted recently are for the replacement of base load coal, so you need to compare apples with apples. This report does not do that.

I would like to see a debate on the nuclear v's renewables cost for domestic electricity supply.

Expand

And your point is?

As net zero is (the impossible) aim the cost is as in the OP. Correct?
7 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

ASX Market Close: Tariff fatigue truly evident; RBA eftpos proposal sinks Tyro

WIN

'Incorrect datasets': Old irony sets WIN Metals up for golden opportunity at Emjay

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Sayona intercepts, Bowen Coking crisis | July 15

First 7 Last

SPONSORED BY