I believe they will lodge tomorrow Apolloz but I would be more than happy on this occasion to be wrong.
I think using very similar excuses as the Scomo play to justify the rejection of the SVE to be an extremely sloppy move. I believe they had a trump card to play in the words of the previous SVE approval. Don’t quote me but it went along the lines of ‘any further SVE applications will be looked upon unfavourably’. That would have been a great play. They could have easily said, we told you last time we won’t extend. They didn’t.
financial reasons, precedence has been set.
public interest, good luck with that. What did the tribunal say about Woodside extension and the public interest component? Public interest takes a back seat at this stage for us any way. Let NOPSEMA deal with public interest.
i think we are in the box seat and our 1.5 lawyers are chomping at the bit over this one
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
