Food is bought, traded, exchanged, purchased as futures etc. What you're advocating is control of the source when that won't stop the buying and selling of the end product.
# If you want to control the source then you starve the farms of water, like is happening currently in the Murray Darling. When the farms are denied water, the ag land loses its value UNLESS more rain falls.
A few years back Menindee had no water thanks to the water being stolen, which made arable land values there drop. The ABC can't win votes for labor on farms outback by advocating farmers go on strike on their own farms so not much happened. But now, water from the sky has filled dams and made it a viable ag industry area again.
What the left have tried is to claim that climate change means less water falling from the sky when in fact, it's the exact opposite. Anyway, I enjoy watching failed marxist pushes in the bush- they always fail.
