What I would like to know is why after completing 10000m of drilling in 2012 they left the testing of their best target to the very end of their program? Shouldn't they have drilled their best target first?
Sure they finish the year with a couple of nice intercepts, but wouldn't it have been better to do that earlier on and then be able to follow-up?
Or were they just trying to get some encouraging news at the end of a disappointing year by drilling holes into a known mineralised zone so they were 'guaranteed' some positive news?
What I would like to know is why after completing 10000m of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AGE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
4.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $178.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 4.6¢ | 4.7¢ | 4.5¢ | $214.1K | 4.663M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 121236 | 4.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7¢ | 1111854 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AGE (ASX) Chart |