The alleged sex is either consensual or rape. Nothing else.
the law does not explicitly state how sober a person needs to be in order to make an informed decision. It is up to a judge to decide if a complainant was too drunk to consent.
Does anyone here actually believe that in her drunken almost comatose state she was capable of giving consent in the first place. secondly when she was trying to get him off of her does anyone think she was consenting to him continuing the act?
The chance of this being both an informed decision and a consensual act are IMO zero. Therefore there is only one outcome.
