"The story is so one sided because it is clear cut! So many women pointing the finger at 1 man which none came forward before Brittany due to his status in the party! They would have looked at the stats of 1 in 10 being successful & weighed that up against a government who runs the police that will investigate. Again, you don't have to be a brain surgeon to understand why these women would not come forward."
Actually the story is NOT so clear cut - lets see the evidence before saying that. Until there is evidence then it is "he said, she said" Is the guy a dirt bag that has taken advantage of women - yep sounds like it (probably allot of dirtbags like that on Tinder as well)! Was it rape - not sure we will ever truly know. Trial by media and sensationalism is not proof of rape - plenty of people can spin a believable story deliberately for their own benefit and/or have actually twisted things in their own mind to believe what they now believe to be the truth. Is that the case here we don't know - let the investigation ensue but given the time elapsed it is going to be hard to prove.
