Brittany&#039;s selective memory

Originally posted by Pinnacle: ↑

I know right? This feels like it has been the top story everyday for a long while doesn't it? Looks like it will have plenty of run to go while so many questions are left unanswered & Scotty & team keep getting caught out for telling furphy's! Strap in with the popcorn as we see more revealed in the next few weeks.........Things like,
- The investigation to reveal no other person being sacked for the same infringement that this perp was sacked for..... proving everyone knew that he was really sacked for sexual assault, disguised it as a security breach.
- Reynolds will resign for medical reasons so Scomo can keep up the charade & cover-up!
- Security staff will be found to contradict what the PM 3 have said as well as the Finance dept.
- The perp will have been found to enter Parliament many times after his dismissal (this could have been a reason Brittany decided to come forward....perhaps she bumped into him again on more than 1 occasion in the building). This will place immense pressure on the PM 3 to resign once they are proved to have known about the assault all along.
- Even more women coming forward pointing the finger at the same perp & others yet to be revealed.

The story is so one sided because it is clear cut! So many women pointing the finger at 1 man which none came forward before Brittany due to his status in the party! They would have looked at the stats of 1 in 10 being successful & weighed that up against a government who runs the police that will investigate. Again, you don't have to be a brain surgeon to understand why these women would not come forward.

I guess there should be remedial classes for those that just don't get it so it can be explained so they get it! I guess you also can't fix stupid!

Expand

"The story is so one sided because it is clear cut! So many women pointing the finger at 1 man which none came forward before Brittany due to his status in the party! They would have looked at the stats of 1 in 10 being successful & weighed that up against a government who runs the police that will investigate. Again, you don't have to be a brain surgeon to understand why these women would not come forward."

Actually the story is NOT so clear cut - lets see the evidence before saying that. Until there is evidence then it is "he said, she said"
Is the guy a dirt bag that has taken advantage of women - yep sounds like it (probably allot of dirtbags like that on Tinder as well)! Was it rape - not sure we will ever truly know. Trial by media and sensationalism is not proof of rape - plenty of people can spin a believable story deliberately for their own benefit and/or have actually twisted things in their own mind to believe what they now believe to be the truth. Is that the case here we don't know - let the investigation ensue but given the time elapsed it is going to be hard to prove.