Even Higgins can't point to a specific conversation where she was pressured to withdraw the complaint.
Apparently there must have been a few to point to...... Speaking to Network Ten, she claimed she had told her employer and the minister told her she would be supported if she pursued a police complaint, but she felt pressured not to, believing it would end her career. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-56134659
And further to that had the investigation continued it still would have been all confidential while the investigation continued, most likely past the election.
lol, yeah right it wouldn't get out.......are you sure some close to Scomo might have some ambition in letting something slip? Or perhaps how the Feds raiding the unions wasn't leaked to the press by Cash?
If there is no cover up why have they not been forthcoming with direct answers? Do you not see their failure to answer as to why the perp was sacked & 3 different scenarios so far as being suspicious? Did you not find Scomo's story in question time as to refer to senate estimates knowing the investigations were all paused suspicious? Did you believe him when he was distressed women didn't think he was listening & told us all he was listening then publicises an incorrect assault case with newscorp showing he might be listening but still obviously not getting it???? Does it not raise concerns that investigations have stopped or paused? The journo's told her that staff from Scomo's office were directly involved in trying to discredit or hurt her loved ones......does that not raise the slightest suspicion or should that even be OK?
If not you people have serious flaws in your analysis of anything!
