Thank you, I wouldnt expect them to lie either, but outcomes...

Thank you, I wouldnt expect them to lie either, but outcomes from sponsored research by say, an intern somewhere at a consultancy is usually very different to independent research, hence my question regarding what you may have found in terms of validating the numbers.

I would suggest the same applies in terms of share / timings and forecasts in terms of revenue generation, whilst not lying perse, it is of course int he best interest of a companies leadership to put forward the best case scenarios to investors. In this way and along these lines I do in a way applaud the slide in the PER decks at the moment that shows what happens in terms of trial outcomes from a best case to a lower outcome.

As I read Notta's posts I align that brokers need to take a more realistic view in terms of ensuring they maintain a client base and some form of credibility. External validation however, always helps. It would be good to see some history here and although its a differnt space, I might backtest PNV's forecast vs actuals as they have had an interesting journey (dont hold, have always wanted to)

Thanks again for the reply