Have to agree with @robbo24 here.
Having such a lien simply means that mining companies based in Tanzania are obliged (and coerced if necessary) to make payment of royalties and taxes to the government.
Given that the graphite at Epanko is already caught by the definition in the current legislation, where is the change in the effect that the new legislation would have?
Secondly, if the government has already granted a mining license, what powers exist to revoke such in the event that the miner complies with all of the terms of the license?
Have to agree with @robbo24 here. Having such a lien simply...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 433 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
12.0¢ |
Change
0.015(14.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $54.48M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 11.0¢ | 12.0¢ | 10.5¢ | $85.61K | 760.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50000 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0¢ | 24094 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EGR (ASX) Chart |