bta, page-7

re: bta, sorry...what sort of signs? This is the second time there has been a thread with a misleading title in relation to Biota in the last couple of days.

It's one thing to claim that Biota is 'going down': after all that's a subjective opinion, and its certainly possible; its also possible for it to go up. It's another thing to title a post: "Biota, worrying signs", and then print an article where the exact opposite is the case.

Is there another agenda at work here?