So your litigation is “agnostic” to the destruction of the plant to cover the legal liabilities if you actually point a finger. But you were happy to link an article just yesterday that is far from agnostic. “Suspicious activity”.
What is your agenda here?
Im a firm believer of objective information. So when all evidence suggests otherwise why would the CBD publish an article that suggests something more sinister?
Have you spoken to members of the INR team?
buckwheat, page-11
Add INR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
14.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $327.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 14.0¢ | 14.5¢ | 13.8¢ | $223.5K | 1.599M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 1815263 | 13.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0¢ | 59586 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 09/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| INR (ASX) Chart |