Bullying continues !!!, page-309

Deja Vu......this has been discussed before

Readers please note that the various comments by PC were not all made on the same day and important events including expiry of PE time windows, lodgement of FAR dispute notice and public statements by the various parties occurred on various dates around the different comments.

Out of context on their own the comments might even seem contradictory but in context of the various events may make more coherent sense. Some are referring to the PE of the working interest triggered by the change of control of the holding company, others are referring to the holding companies shares and the comment about rights not existing may be referring to an apparent intent of FAR to assert a right to PE the holding company itself on the same terms as WPL (you cant PE a company). I would caution that any simplistic common context can not be assumed. The arbitrators will have the full picture and context.

Soon we will know if everything was in order or not......the arguments have been made in court.