But wait, there's more

[ Simgrund, point taken, and I happily stand corrected. ] 2 CentsWorth

Hello 2CW,
Thanks for your sensible re-examination of this forum’s tricky labyrinths.

Let’s then give a trial run to suggestion by seamisty as indicated:
“…… those that report PIF/OCV posts to be moderated should also be made
to post their reasons why on the related PIF thread before the post is moderated?”
--------------------------------------------
Version 1.
if required to provide reasons “before the post is moderated”

-- I am posting this explanation regarding my intent to REPORT to Moderators
on post by xxxx of xxxx date and xxxx number.
My reasons are xxxxxxxxx, and especially xxXXczxxY.
I hope the moderators will act on this report and it’s a relief for me to expurgate
this issue from my system.

Comment: moderators may not act on the REPORT and the “Honest Poster”
will wear her/his non-event to their detrimental worst.

Version 2
if “should be made to post” (a coersion?) subsequent to REPORTing
and the Target Post is removed

-- These are my reasons for reporting to moderators this post:
xxxxx; Xxxxx (and so on). I am pleased to see it removed from public view.

Comment:
the “Honest Poster” will wear her/his dob-in-event to their detrimental worst.

Version 3
-- Run the original idea past HC Administration to see if they are prepared to deal
with inflated traffic in posts and added burden of catch-up courses in Graces of Patience.

Version 4
-- If it ain't broken...; IOWs leave things as they are.
--------------------------------------------
Any refinements to above versions?
And let's keep awareness of HotCopper fine guidelines on Expletive Reticence?
After all, we are Australians!

Cheers,


-------------------------------------------------------
Worry not Where Worry is not Warranted.