OKU is ok I have looked at them a fair bit, they are only 14...

  1. 5,578 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 50
    OKU is ok I have looked at them a fair bit, they are only 14 holes in fair bit more risk in them, so it's hard to say one way or the other.

    They have shown a few high grade meters here and there, but they have yet to intersect in the near surface zones, they need to do alot more drilling to prove they have a large scale project, all the drilling that has happened so fair is within a very small 200m x 100m area, target area overall is also smaller than the other two, in my experience companies have a habit of drilling the best area's first, so I am always apprehensive about consistency until they test a fair chuck of strike.

    Another thing to consider is drilling isn't free, so for OKU to catch up to BYR and CDV they will have drill alot more holes, they are definitely behind progress wise.

    So I wouldn't put them up there with CDV or BYR yet, they are definately a drilling campaign or two behind them, positives they are in the right location if your a fan of nearology, they are finding high grade areas, At current market cap I do see them as abit more risky then BYR and CDV, they have to prove alot with the next drilling campaign they have drilled alot of holes in a small area it's time to step out and prove this thing has scale like CDV and BYR have.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.