Agreed, why would they have been part of the $5.4M capital raising if they thought that it was a duster?
I am with them as well. One of the institutions has already stated that they invested at 61c for 'what is already there' and I am sure that they are not after only a 5-10% return for what is already there. Therefore, the shareprice should (in their view) be worth significantly more than at present excluding leadville. Now if leadville comes home look out!
Oh, and dont forget all the other prospects that they have including Utah Uranium!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GDN
- c e locke revisited
c e locke revisited, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated