I don't think it works that way. The reason the bank forces the hedge when loaning money is because they don't want to gamble on the gold price. I would imagine that Macquarie is purely taking delivery of the gold to forward to the actual buyer on the other side of the contract at $2,350 oz for a brokerage fee. Perhaps someone knows for sure.
Macquarie however may have guaranteed CAI's delivery to the other side of the contract however at $2,350 oz which if the case, would be a reason for Macquarie to not want Calidus to go under. If this was the case, Macquarie would have to buy at spot $3,000 say to sell to deliver the hedge at $2,350 oz, thus losing $650 per oz for the remainder of the hedge.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CAI
- CAI Valuation - comparison to peers
CAI Valuation - comparison to peers, page-177
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAI (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $93.67M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CAI (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online