AUL 0.00% 28.5¢ austar gold limited

calcifer change lawyers....again, page-22

  1. 3,072 Posts.
    if the court orders that the tenements be transferred to MNM it doesn't matter who controls legal title.

    courts do not vacate trial dates because prats like calcifer can't decide which lawyers to use.

    if you are reading this directors of calcifer you need to be clear that if this goes to trial and your case is rejected as an opportunistic try on that you will probably be sued for the losses you have caused to MNM shareholders as a result of your conduct.

    I reckon we can round up several hundred investors from HC real easy to give you people a dose of what you deserve. Slater & Gordon or Maurice Blackburn to run the case. Litigation funding from IMF?

    The possible ambit of the claim will be the profits all MNM holders for the last 3 years would have made if Mt M had not been hijacked by your baseless legal claim.

    At a guess that will be about $200 million worth of legal claim you have to look forward to.

    you should listen to all those lawyers you have sacked and get out of this while you still can.







 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add AUL (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.