Hi Frantic,
understand your point of view. but it has been on the agenda to remove sadam for at least 15 years, there was assasination plots, the golf war they planed to do it then too, WMD was not the be all and end all on the point. but on that topic you have to remember the UN also had inspectors in for some time which sadam ended up baning against the UN request. Sadam also had plenty of time to hide the evidance as the US tried to please the UN by giving them time.. The UN inspectors were also saying the Iraqi goverment was no co operating on the inspections and taking them to different places they were asking them to take them too and claiming that was the sie. in all this time they could have hidden WMD which we know they had and were developing in the past.
But these hippies here recon howard / bush used WMD as a lie to get Iraq's oil. Which it wasnt, it was just another string in the big bow of reasons to remove him.
So if the hippys are right, and they must have some figures to argu so strong, how much is the US now profiting out of this war investment?
and yes, i know none of these hippys will be able to answer or demonstrate their claim, because they are just ranting on media hype most probably started from Michael Moore.
- Forums
- General
- call to charge howard with war crimes
call to charge howard with war crimes, page-258
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)