A precedent is considered binding
if a judgement has come from an equal or higher court. If a precedent comes from a lower court it can be considered persuasive, and does not have to be followed.
If a new precedent is set in a higher court all lower levels of court need to follow the new precedent.
What ruling are you refering to regarding an annonomous public formum defamation case?
A precedent is considered binding if a judgement has come from...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 104 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RXL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $61.08M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 14.5¢ | 15.0¢ | 14.5¢ | $9.604K | 66.06K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32227 | 14.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0¢ | 246206 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.44pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RXL (ASX) Chart |