Calling of general meeting Sect 249D/203D, page-5

Hey @FrankRockefield,

Quick question from me before we start getting into the details of resolutions etc, but what are your thoughts on the strategy of us attaining a 5% member vote to enable a 249D to even get off the ground in the first place? The older rule of 100 separate share holders would have been easier to achieve I would have thought, but that option no longer exists for my research of the amended Corporation Act?

Cheers