Calls For New Brown Coal Projects, page-107

I agree with what you say and said so in the past. My point is the May 9 2016 independent study is about specialty chemicals (compounds) and those compounds produce the confusion as to whether OHD is about biostimulants and my post you replied to addressed that issue btw. The overriding market announcement by GPP in relation to the 9 May 2016 study was around biostimulants and not specialty chemicals - a mismatch on what GPP said and what the study was focussing on. So what I expect from the PFS is the products they are targeting in the now and in the future from the OHD process, without giving away your IP, are actually stipulated and that would end the nonsence around this mismatch theory. That 9 May study is what a few posters here rely on to question the biostimulants aspects of OHD btw so there re missing links and statements to the effect of product distribution in the PFS will go a long way to quelling some of the stuff that is said on this forum, and that is what I wasreferring to in the post you commented on. In Post #: 25223268 I said this in italics below on the question of IP protection and what you can give to inform the market without giving away your secrets to the market btw. All IMO

"Now patents transcend to intangibles as does R&D. You keep questioning VBC because you don't have all the data you want. That is called protecting your IP if you need to know. I doubt GPP will publish all its material because its advantage is that it has spent a wad of cash over 4 years developing and refining the process of IP development so that it can benefit from the patent itself. That is it has marketing advantage it wants to protect.

The patent itself does not provide all the specifics you are after - it is the R&D GPP has been doing that makes the patent work. And on that front the Anns say what they need to say but if you do not agree with the process well so what, but the fact of the matter is the growth rates are there and I stand by all my posts in this thread so cannot be bothered repeating them again. KFC doesn't publish/patent its 11 herbs and spices because they want to keep their recipe under lock and key (maybe because it can be duplicated more easily if they release all the data). Limiting the data release keeps your competitive advantage."