Firstly, with reference to an 'educated' contribution, the 98%...

Firstly, with reference to an 'educated' contribution, the 98% handover of rail is accurate and what the other poster stated is a lie and incorrect. Not sure what your problem is with this!

Otherwise, the motivation is very simple.
There is a small cohort of ANS holders who over time have equally posted garbage and seem to enjoy driving the dagger into long suffering SDL holders in SDL threads. So essentially just giving some back in return.

On the flip side, of course I do not wish for ANS holders to lose out. To be burnt as badly by Mr G / SDL, I do not wish on anyone.
'Your' hero, Ding reneged on the $100M that was to be the catalyst for SDL's revival.
So I am actually genuinely concerned that similar fate awaits you because you are in bed with the same corrupt, cheating, thieving lot that SDL had the misfortune and stupidity to deal with.

To your questions 1 and 5 , None and None. Responding to those in between are therefore somewhat irrelevant.
Have a nice day