I reckon there is hint of complicity going on between the Institute of Director’s and some the brokerage companies etc
A prominent Investor Service company wrote a glowing report about a recent company on-market buyback scheme.
I thought I’II test them out on why the following Capital Return has fallen out of favour, as I see it as the most equitable way to distribute excess funds.
This form of return ensure that every shareholders shares a portion of the excess monies that isn’t paid out as dividends.
I also mentioned that with the current cost of living crisis that such an extra payment would be beneficial to many people.
Basically it is possible to get 2 dividends and an extra CR payment within a financial.
The investment service respondent, replied with the usual waffle about passive shareholders gaining benefits of on-market buyback future benefits.
I responded it only is targeting the benefit for Institutions and larger shareholders to minimise their tax obligation and were they aware of this other form of capital return - no response at all!
I believe that is what they meant by the mantra, “the most efficient way to return capital” , someone can correct me if my tax assessment is incorrect.
If my logic is correct the number of company that had buybacks this financial year, I would question their claims that they are good corporate citizens!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Can ACCC act on behalf of Shareholders?
I reckon there is hint of complicity going on between the...
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online