Very good question ...
It says it is an example but the figures seem realistic.
Obviously it is a retrofit of an existing building.
It is a 24.3Kw system with 875 square metres of glass. It is therefore generating power at an average rate of 28w per square metre.
South facing windows on the upper floors are to be replaced. This means all windows are optimally positioned so the figures are reasonable and consistent with the Vicinity trial.
Furthermore, if we assume each window has an area of 2.2 square metres that gives a total of 400 windows to be replaced.
The total project cost is $131,137 US dollars. This would mean each of the 400 windows cost $490 (Australian dollars) to install.
These figures seem reasonable. A four way split between Clearview, manufacturer, distributor, and installer would return $122.50 per window to each party.
For all the knockers out there who say there are no figures, these figures are pretty clear to me.
Very good question ...It says it is an example but the figures...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 98 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CPV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
54.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(2.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $137.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 55.5¢ | 56.5¢ | 54.0¢ | $481.7K | 872.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 29707 | 54.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0¢ | 11774 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CPV (ASX) Chart |