Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Reliable sources? Where are they you scammer? You are...

First 173 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tigmeister

13,762 Posts.

132

08/03/21

22:00

Post #: 51611653
Share

Originally posted by DBT9: ↑

''So now you need to post Ernst's entire papers so we can go through them and see who is telling the truth. No appeals to authority of the British Medical Pharmacopeia. Why would I trust them, particularly in any discussion about Homeopathy?''

I don't have to do anything. I have posted reviews on homeopathy from independent medical journals, Australian medical, Smithsonian, etc...which, all agree, that homeopathy when it has been put to rigorous double blind experiments, has not produced significant results.

You reject reliable sources in favour of aberrations.

You can wail, gnash your teeth, search frantically for ideologues like Robert Hahn, who's trickery has been exposed, yet you have made no case for the efficacy of homeopathy.

You have not made a case for the efficacy of homeopathy because you don't have the necessary evidence. 1,800 experiments have been able to to that.

The best you can do is search for exceptions and mavericks who try to support the homeopathy industry....and that, Tig, is not good enough to make a case.

Expand

Reliable sources? Where are they you scammer? You are consistently dishonest. You can't even post the three studies I've asked you for by Ernst. Fact is we need to go through them in order to ascertain who is telling the truth, but it's behind a paywall and you are unwilling to post it.
You've lost the debate, you can't or you are unwilling to back up your claim by posting the fraudulent studies.

Last edited by tigmeister: 08/03/21
Upvote

Reply