can we do a poll, page-33

In my mind the difference is that the 1000bn tonnes DSO is speculated about, but is not yet proven and is years, and a major dilution, away from development.

I can see some benefits for GBG but I feel that SDL shareholders have in fact got control of GBG at a cheap price as a reverse takeover. I feel 3 for 1 would have been a more appropriate ratio given the less immediate income from SDL's project and that the run up in SDL's share price from 50c or has obviously been sparked by "informed" buying

regards

Peter