Canadian Debacle, page-65

Personally, I am surprised that SGQ shareholders are not more vocal in pushing Management for the reason/s why an expensive and time consuming analysis - which needed to be conducted on the other side of the planet - failed so poorly? SGQ management should have responded promptly and thoroughly.

Aside from the cost and time losses from what occurred in Canada, the failure to properly provide a professional explanation to SGQ shareholders and the Market, actually leaves us in the dark. Who made the decision to blend the mineral samples? By remaining almost mute on the subject, SGQ management have set an unwelcome president and raised the future possibility of the same muted behavior occurring in the future - should another unfavourable event occur. SGQ shareholders could face the same unsatisfactory outcome in the future. And next time (if there is a next time) in may well be in an area of exploration where control of the process is not 100% scientifically based on a great number of prepared metallurgical and geochemistry tests.

It also brings unnecessary doubt upon the competency of the consultants used by SGQ. Experienced mining professionals who surely were consulted numerous times to determine the range of tests and to bring focus upon the intent of this analysis in light of future mining operations.

Broosta