Image 1 below: Incidence of blossom end rot 0% using OHD (ie eliminated) vs 9% incidence with a commercially available fulvic product.
Image 2 below: Increased yield ~30% using OHD over an available commercially available product.
So how is Ca treatment more cost effective? Will it increase the fruit yield? If it doesn't then the alternative would be to use another fertilizer or biostimulant.
Surely this is a cost addition?
One OHD treatment vs Ca + alternative biostimulant/ fertilizer to possibly achieve the same result....
Image 1 below: Incidence of blossom end rot 0% using OHD (ie...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 103 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GNM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.700M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2235468 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 15052 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.28pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GNM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable