Priceless.
"
Most of his assertions have a highly emotional nuance"
Are you declaring the facts that have been noted are now not facts?
Are you declaring that some of the information provided in the recent Annual Report is false? If so, which parts?
Notwithstanding your churlish "nuance" comment, are you able to comment on the following facts? Not sure how one adds nuance to a fact but I am sure you can tell us how to do that as well. Further, the holder and non-holder dichotomy is plainly pointless. I think that you simply do not like questions and facts that run counter to your views. Asserting that somehow the views of a holder versus those of a non-holder (irrespective of the content) are of more worth is plainly ludicrous.
And the exhortation to contact management - have you read any previous posts - particularly those of holders who have done so? many have noted that they do not even receive replies to their questions.
Perhaps you can answer these to begin with and then I will follow up with a few more.
1. Do you deny that the "sale" of ML1492 to Volcan for a consideration of $1,200,000.00 took place? (page 68 Annual Report)
2. Do you deny the payment of $120,579 to the Sydney Talmudical College Association, an entity ofwhich Sholom Feldman is a Director? This was for services provided by Elimelech Levy (
a close relative of Pnina and Sholom Feldman) formarketing and sales work and project development. Also included is an additional $60,000 paid to AGMPL for Elimelech Levy’s services. (my bold) (see page 67 Annual Report).
3. Do you deny that following the "company transforming" cap raise, people that purchased shares at 3.5c, have now ether lost or, have a paper loss of 88.5714% of their capital?
4. Do you deny that CGB Board has granted Mrs Feldman 70,000,000 shares for her long termservice, as per the terms of her contract?
5. Do you deny that the above mentioned person has presided over a company that has accumulated losses of in excess of $42,000,000.00 (see the most recent Annual Report).
My opinion is that you have a very clear agenda. I also believe that the posters around here have been around long enough and it appears that they know far more than you about the machinations of CGB. They can make their own conclusions as to your motive(s).
"
What Canntab Management has achieved since 2019 is breathtaking in its scope."
And those are your words - are they not adding a "highly emotional nuance"?
And what a claim it is.
Are you surprised that the market doesn't value CGB at anything more than 4 or 5
tenths of a cent particularly given this 'breathtaking achievement' of Canntab?
If you want some further reading - have a read for yourself.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VSCA/2017/269.htmlIt seems that it is a very rare poster that is prepared to apply the label of "breathtaking" achievement (I actually did have a laugh at that one). Hyperbole on steroids!
