Gral
That is not a particular logical arguement there. The tender for the port is unrelated to the case and is done through a jointly MMX/Mitsubishi owned vehicle.
Banks given size of partner will always put up money. However Mitsubishi still hasnt finished paying for its 50% share of IO assets and that is where I assume MMX was going to get there contribution to infrastructure.
Even though you say the case is a dud still cant see Mitsubishi handing over any more money until case is resolved or else it will go into a trust pending an outcome.
Would you care to elaborate on why the case is a dud or is that just wishful thinking.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.07M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.4¢ | $36.69K | 7.556M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | 22352035 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 14512739 | 14 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |