As you know, Shane, I have a philosophical antipathy to placements as opposed to pro-rata entitlements, and I think NOR has lost points by taking the former path. It is also ethically dubious that, with 10,000 shares only, I can qualify for the same entitlement as a holder with 5,000,000 shares. One also wonders also what proportion of the funds raised go to pay the fees of Azure Capital.
Be that as it may, I think the expression "first-come, first-served" was used in relation to the issue to existing shareholders. In practice, a mail-out from Perth will reach WA holders a day or two earlier than it would reach, say, an honest man in Mullumbimby. Hypothetically, the WA holders can grab their entitlement before our honest man in the hills can get to his letter-box. Is this a deliberate ploy by NOR management to look after mates, or is "first-come, first-served" totally inaccurate ?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NOR
- Capital Raising: attention Shane
Capital Raising: attention Shane
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 102 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NOR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
4.8¢ |
Change
0.001(2.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $22.72M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
4.6¢ | 4.8¢ | 4.3¢ | $5.638K | 122.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 83888 | 4.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.9¢ | 18148 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 83888 | 0.042 |
2 | 175000 | 0.041 |
1 | 100000 | 0.040 |
1 | 200000 | 0.039 |
1 | 355000 | 0.038 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.049 | 18148 | 1 |
0.050 | 482000 | 3 |
0.056 | 60000 | 1 |
0.058 | 137000 | 2 |
0.059 | 95632 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NOR (ASX) Chart |