Yes bhn looked that way to me too.
Cracow costs were $550 per oz but Edna May costs not stated. It worries me a bit when costs are hidden.
EM Production 13413 at 1557 is equivalent to 20.9 m sales.
Processing+Mining costs included at 16m
Admin 2.5 m plus project development 4.5 m makes total costs for the one mine greater than earnings.
So desperately need higher production and lower costs at EM to pay off the 62m debt.
Am I missing something?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CAH
- catalpa
catalpa, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)