Well unfortunately I didn't attend the AGM so all I have to go on is what has been reported by those that did. I am not treating this information as fact - I doubt it is true, which I why I am predicting that we won't get the cell-associated data next week despite what those that attended the meeting were told.
I am making a prediction, much like those that are predicting that BIT is about to sign a billion dollar partnership agreement or be bought out for $20 billion. While my prediction will be proven true or false next week, how are you going to prove your prediction that I am "manipulating for my own purposes whatever they might be"?
